What is the method for a SwiftWill guide?
Find the question a person actually types. Write a verdict in the first 60 words, including who should skip it. Support the verdict with the statute or gov.uk page, dated. Add a comparison table where numbers exist. Interlink both directions. Stop if the page would duplicate another URL.
- Check the slug registry so we never publish a second page for one query.
- Pull the primary source: legislation.gov.uk, gov.uk, HMCTS, Law Commission, HMRC.
- Write question-shaped headings with a self-contained answer under each.
- Put competitor prices only where the provider still publishes them.
- Run the honesty gate: if a solicitor is the right tool, say so before any CTA.
Where do the numbers come from?
Statutory figures (intestacy legacy, probate court fee, IHT bands) come from gov.uk or legislation, with the date we checked. Survey ranges for will ownership are labelled as ranges because YouGov, IRN and Will Aid do not ask identical questions. We publish the underlying tables as CSV on open data.
What will SwiftWill not publish?
We will not invent a statistic, scrape a forum and rewrite it as our voice, mark up competitor star ratings as our Review, or date-stamp a page without changing it. We will not tell an unmarried couple that "common-law marriage" will save them. That claim is false in England and Wales.
Full policy: editorial policy. Citation checks: how we check AI citations. Author: Marcus Kaiser.